justice as an internal advocate publicus
justice is an inner feeling of an individual, with whom he or his behavior in terms of its impact on other compares the point that he himself at added to the body of the other and now his own behavior as related to self-assess. This possibility is the man because of his awareness as a perception of self, which perceives itself again in the system of opposing endless mirrors of mirrors. This property allows him and the consequences of his actions again perceive a higher level and thereby to change the assumptions themselves in the place of others and to put the other way around. In this way he creates in the form of justice as an inner instance an advocate publicus; an agent of the others that already in the formation of will an individual it concerns the other so be as it his own, can sympathize. The impetus for this purpose, each individual from the fact that his single life part of a respective public life is dominated by the formerly the Gods the busy world, when the goddess with her power they only touched her body and fertilized. The participation is based on individuals' ability to pass on his life, which is the subject of his sexuality and also of giving birth . This already biologically determined characteristics are in him due to the awareness of participation in public life and therefore to the power of the goddess to an agent that Divine than about himself looking beyond to learn. The man now takes its decisions to the formation of his will, the direction is that of public life, as it was prescribed by the goddess. From this context, man gains the certainty that he learns as truth , the love by which links the vitality of the individual, and together with the pleasure the way to happiness , has the responsibility that fills every man his freedom , and also the justice by which this responsibility to the needs of others is based on that may affect the decisions and behavior of individuals. everything finds its foundation in pleasure and love, the goddess of vibrant and inspired the world. The justice thus appears to be a perception that the conduct in relation to other controls, as a claim against himself, not as an instance, would refer to how others should behave towards me. justice prevails in giving, but not with the company.
justice determines the actions and not expect
justice can any man feel only in its interior, it is part of his consciousness determined it to him by the divine life force for his behavior, but not to his expectations of how others behave towards him. Such conclusions, the individual moves only in reflection of their own behavior and to derive, match can expect others to. His own willingness however, imply means of justice even to advocate publicus of others is actually intended, however, crucially on the behavior of others, for everything is always a mutual give and take, even if the balance sometimes not immediately but even only in the distance moved is. Hence many are now inclined to understand the justice as an individual between the standing instance, when they could regulate their behavior as a lens directly on both sides. But this is a mistake, because in the divine life force has no such idea in part. These are found only in one's subjective decision of each individual regarding his own conduct, so the corresponding Circumstances of the continuity of such internal justice serving subjective judgments are very different. The mistake, however, in justice if it were an objective, that is valid regardless of the individual scale has dire consequences, is not common as in generalizations of properties of individuals not to ideas, justice -based on their individual fundamental into its opposite. This can find anyone who looks at the practice, he always finds people who derive their contrary claims of an allegedly objective justice on their own. Who keeps his calls Claim as well to be fair and non-acceptance for not less unjust, like the feel of their rejection of the claim concerned as just and their settlement as unfair. Both, however, commit the mistake of justice not only their behavior, but to relate to the other and make them the object of their expectations. If there really an objective law of justice, then they should apply equally everywhere, and their verdict should always be raised, whether the same would be received or considered by the giver her glasses all doubt. The distribution of recipients would refer to the same justice as the one who had to make, and distributive justice would be only the reverse side of the collection justice and vice versa, and all would be equally reasonable - a mockery of the practice. Justice is nothing other than love, love only can an individual and not general public.
eats justice as a universal right
As with all generalizations, in which forget their virtuality and thus the fiction of its existence and a being which is attributed, also loses an objective justice, which in the society there, pretty soon their real relationship with the souls of every individual. Because everything can in the virtual world of society only have the meaning which it has been settled it, this applies to every idea, every form, every law of choice for every conceptual and abstract, one does not eat or drink and can not love with lust. The company is based on information that contains the instructions or directions to any individual, how to behave at a certain time at a certain place for something special occasions, and therefore virtual, that is the will the effect to depend on its formation involved. Information can be issued only by symbols and a symbol has only the meaning that it has settled its previously in a convention. It's no different with justice as a social phenomenon. It is only a concept that lives on its definition. Justice as an objective measure is always exploited, which means you get to their uses to an event objective, and their own. As each man knows well from within the justice of love, but also the hunger and pain, believes He lightly those who exploit the benefit of their cause of justice, that their general conception of justice with the sensation was identical in detail and thus gives the other a power over him. But this is a predatory trick that has nothing else in mind than to rob the individual's autonomous decision by abstract is he feigned as concrete. In fact, this approach serves to circumvent the socially defined ways, and what can one ask of others. These paths are those of the law and not that of justice. The right is created between the parties in an open process according to fixed rules and applies to all the same information as for their expected behavior. The justice aims to the right way to undermine by usurping the binding force of truth to that previously they put into it in themselves to enforce the law against. The truth is there but just as the equity in general, the social and virtual, it is found as a reflection of the goddess only in detail. Strikingly, in the political conflict is an alleged justice also always been used only to demand from others, and rarely when it comes to whether the giving is the other one just for her behavior. Accordingly, the application of the equity in their apparent objectivity is already into its opposite wrong, because it is born from the divine to assume duty, his conduct to the general living relieved, but not from the expectation that the behavior of others about their work to be. In the political debate, therefore, justice is also invariably help to cover up the other wrongs. Who calls for more social justice, in reality means something more, the other is to be taken away, not that donors like to lodge a justice to be identical.
justice promotes only one in his own soul
justice that the individual leaves, is a scourge and disfigured the right and is solely political, religious or ideological exploitation within the meaning of the interests of those who appeal to justice. The justice, however, who put the goddess with the truth, their desire and love and happiness of the people in the soul provides, not a right but puts to the duty to consider also the other, this happens only in the soul of every individual. This is, however, nor indeed by the love the other a right to demand given, but it will possibly create expectations that have an impact on how you handle yourself with the justice continued. But all that may, on the basis of the social may be required by an individual is mandatory only in the form of law. For only the law also provides for mandatory information, such individuals have to act in order not to endanger the goal to be effected. Otherwise, each is only obliged to do what he discloses the goddess when it as part of public life can feel something in common, as in the worship in our sanctuary . Because in there experienced Generalization of lust and love each part of public life and discovers the goddess force when he joins the other . The alien is in the Association to My and there is no better experience, the advocate of strengthening publicus in detail.
0 comments:
Post a Comment