monitoring and interventions in the life of the people do not begin until data retention, online searches or the new electronic identity card.
Even the recent issue of the identity card is a good example of the State Administration of man. The state collects an immediate right to this country every newborn child of German parents. The newborn must be where and what authorities are also reported. The parents are subject to state educational mission. The child is imposed compulsory education and equipped from an early age with his own passport. However, strangely, things like reporting requirements, compulsory education, passport matters are in any form and educational mission not as an intrusion of the state but perceived as something prior to or on Government. If anything, it is more linked to "so be it!" classified.
Furthermore, the privacy and even the definition of what it is and where it stops by the state established and enforced. It is that which the State may determine that it has not interest him. Man is born with either a natural privacy, yet they do "just round one." The state maintains the privacy of such fundamental importance that he enforces them with laws and a good dose of violence in the form of the judicial system, including police. We are private because the state wants it! The reason our whole law, which also draws a better delivery of duties under the rat's tail.
This is the finest and most misunderstood civil right to freedom. This has little to do with kindness, but much to do with poverty. It is the right of every four to five years to choose - is associated with the duty to be managing his own misery of others, and to obey their commands and laws. To choose who is allowed to keep the dirt shop going.
For politics, which appears as a sphere of freedom, not so free: You must create the economic framework and its gets set by this their own. In law, any employer may choose to own, even the infected forced to choose one. Although we can choose where we work, but not if
This is the finest and most misunderstood civil right to freedom. This has little to do with kindness, but much to do with poverty. It is the right of every four to five years to choose - is associated with the duty to be managing his own misery of others, and to obey their commands and laws. To choose who is allowed to keep the dirt shop going.
For politics, which appears as a sphere of freedom, not so free: You must create the economic framework and its gets set by this their own. In law, any employer may choose to own, even the infected forced to choose one. Although we can choose where we work, but not if
Another argument is that the increasing surveillance offers no better protection against crime or terrorism. First of all, this statement can be concluded that monitoring, because if it actually provides greater protection, would be justified.
Anyway, would it not make more sense instead to think about what social conditions for crime repeatedly reproduce and how to change? If the needs and constraints under which crime occurs are identified and removed, would to argue not about how to protect themselves from it! In a society where survival depends on money and property, it is no surprise that theft and robbery are on the agenda. The penalties of the state not prevent crime but provide only the price with which you must calculate.
Anyway, would it not make more sense instead to think about what social conditions for crime repeatedly reproduce and how to change? If the needs and constraints under which crime occurs are identified and removed, would to argue not about how to protect themselves from it! In a society where survival depends on money and property, it is no surprise that theft and robbery are on the agenda. The penalties of the state not prevent crime but provide only the price with which you must calculate.
The fight against terrorism is not herbeiphantasiert by the State in order to have a pretext for its practical ruthlessness. He would not need to do. Acts against the state and its power to put it in its sovereignty in question - and that he expresses allergic reaction! He sees himself not only in its political program affected, but in its basic existence in the security of its territory and its monopoly on violence.
The use of monitoring and state power is the claim of the totalitarian state that brooks no power side. This is not a betrayal of any democratic principles, but is the way how democracy works! It shows that people in this world only exists as a state-forced Managed.
The overcoming of domination and exploitation can thus be the only reasonable response to any repression!
(Actually a speech to a rally of youth links ['solid], Young Socialists, Green Youth and pirates in Erfurt on data protection, which was but aborted due to bad weather)
0 comments:
Post a Comment